CORRUPT MT. VERNON SCHOOL CHIEF JUDITH JOHNSON |
The administration of
Interim Superintendent Judith Johnson continues to operate in an unscrupulous
and unethical manner. As previously
reported by Mount Vernon Exposed, there is a massive cover up going on at the
central office while public continues to be stonewalled with getting basic
information.
It appears that Judith
Johnson plays by her own set of rules and does not believe in transparency and
full disclosure. Mount Vernon Exposed
publisher Samuel L. Rivers requested documents through the NYS Freedom of
Information Law or F.O.I.L.
A response was received
from the district but the written correspondence from the district was not in
line with the Freedom of Information Law.
The NYS Freedom of Information law states each entity subject to the provisions of
this article, within five business days of the receipt of a written request for
a record reasonably described, shall make such record available to the person
requesting it, deny such request in writing or furnish a written acknowledgment
of the receipt of such request and a statement of the approximate date, which
shall be reasonable under the circumstances of the request, when such request
will be granted or denied, including, where appropriate, a statement that
access to the record will be determined in accordance with subdivision five of
the Freedom of Information Law.
The
Freedom of Information Law further states; 3.
(a) Each entity subject to the provisions of this article, within five business
days of the receipt of a written request for a record reasonably described,
shall make such record available to the person requesting it, deny such request
in writing or furnish a written acknowledgment of the receipt of such request
and a statement of the approximate date, which shall be reasonable under the
circumstances of the request, when such request will be granted or denied,
including, where appropriate, a statement that access to the record will be
determined in accordance with subdivision five of this section. An agency shall
not deny a request on the basis that the request is voluminous or that locating
or reviewing the requested records or providing the requested copies is
burdensome because the agency lacks sufficient staffing or on any other basis
if the agency may engage an outside professional service to provide copying,
programming or other services required to provide the copy, the costs of which
the agency may recover pursuant to paragraph (c) of subdivision one of section
eighty-seven of this article. An agency may require a person requesting lists
of names and addresses to provide a written certification that such person will
not use such lists of names and addresses for solicitation or fund-raising
purposes and will not sell, give or otherwise make available such lists of
names and addresses to any other person for the purpose of allowing that person
to use such lists of names and addresses for solicitation or fund-raising
purposes. If an agency determines to grant a request in whole or in part, and
if circumstances prevent disclosure to the person requesting the record or
records within twenty business days from the date of the acknowledgement of the
receipt of the request, the agency shall state, in writing, both the reason for
the inability to grant the request within twenty business days and a date
certain within a reasonable period, depending on the circumstances, when the
request will be granted in whole or in part. Upon payment of, or offer to pay,
the fee prescribed therefor, the entity shall provide a copy of such record and
certify to the correctness of such copy if so requested, or as the case may be,
shall certify that it does not have possession of such record or that such
record cannot be found after diligent search. Nothing in this article shall be
construed to require any entity to prepare any record not possessed or
maintained by such entity except the records specified in subdivision three of
section eighty-seven and subdivision three of section eighty-eight of this
article. When an agency has the ability to retrieve or extract a record or data
maintained in a computer storage system with reasonable effort, it shall be
required to do so. When doing so requires less employee time than engaging in
manual retrieval or redactions from non-electronic records, the agency shall be
required to retrieve or extract such record or data electronically. Any
programming necessary to retrieve a record maintained in a computer storage
system and to transfer that record to the medium requested by a person or to
allow the transferred record to be read or printed shall not be deemed to be
the preparation or creation of a new record.
What
is Judith Johnson hiding? Why is Judith stalling and stonewalling board
members? Why isn’t Judith giving the
asbestos reports to school board trustees?
Judith
Johnson has not worked in the best interest of the taxpayers since her
inception in Mount Vernon.
Will
Judith do the taxpayers a favor and resign? Only time will tell.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.